|
|
Soaps Boards :: The Young and the Restless Forum :: Spolier: That explains why Nick says no
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
mdtuttle![]() |
I read at the beginning of the week that Nick turns his back on Jack. I assumed it was about the Chancellor stock deal but I couldn't figure out way Nick turned away from JAck. Now I have read that Phyllis tells Nick about the night she had sex with Jack. That would certinaly explain why Nick would not want to have anything to do with Jack. |
laurie6![]() |
Quote mdtuttle: I read at the beginning of the week that Nick turns his back on Jack. I assumed it was about the Chancellor stock deal but I couldn't figure out way Nick turned away from JAck. Now I have read that Phyllis tells Nick about the night she had sex with Jack. That would certinaly explain why Nick would not want to have anything to do with Jack. To be fair though I have said I don't think Nick should have a right to be angry at Phyllis about this because he had run off to be with Sharon. By the same token he can't really be that ticked at Jack. It's not like JAck showed up and took advantage of Phyllis. They were both there, they were both in pain becauase of Nick and Sharon and they comforted each other. I am not sayin that their having sex was right, but I can understand why it happened. It has not happened since and I think Nick really needs to stop and think about what really was going on that night before he blasts anyone. I agree nick has no right to be mad jack forgave nick for havind an affair with phyliss before then nick was with sharon knowing how jack felt for her so for him to be angry is wrong.(I am not sure if jack and sharon were still married at the time.) |
colormebadd![]() |
Quote mdtuttle: I read at the beginning of the week that Nick turns his back on Jack. I assumed it was about the Chancellor stock deal but I couldn't figure out way Nick turned away from JAck. Now I have read that Phyllis tells Nick about the night she had sex with Jack. That would certinaly explain why Nick would not want to have anything to do with Jack. To be fair though I have said I don't think Nick should have a right to be angry at Phyllis about this because he had run off to be with Sharon. By the same token he can't really be that ticked at Jack. It's not like JAck showed up and took advantage of Phyllis. They were both there, they were both in pain becauase of Nick and Sharon and they comforted each other. I am not sayin that their having sex was right, but I can understand why it happened. It has not happened since and I think Nick really needs to stop and think about what really was going on that night before he blasts anyone. "ITA" No surprise there, Nick can't exactly blame Phillis and must have someone to blame and Jack is always the fall guy on this show. |
flygirl1969![]() |
Nick has a lot of nerve! Pot meet kettle!! Phylis can forgive him for leaving her for Sharon and Jack can forgive him for having an affair with Phylis and most importantly, Nick can forgive Victor. I am not a Phick fan and especially not a fan of Phylis but she said she wanted honesty in her marriage and she is being true to her word. |
Lady53![]() |
I don't know how many on here are in Canada and have actually seen the scene yet where Phyllis tells Nick, but if you haven't I think you are jumping the gun here saying Nick has no right. We don't know what was said and if Nick is mad at Phyllis or not or even Jack for that matter. Since none of us have seen Friday's (Thusday-CND) eppy yet then we should hold judgement. JMHO |
candice2![]() |
Nick has no right to be mad at Jack, he slept with Sharon,Jack's wife at the time. |
sj77![]() |
Regardless of whether or not he has the right to be mad is not the issue. If you love someone, then you're going to be upset if they are with someone else. So yes, he has no right, but I don't blame him..IF he is upset. |
overit![]() |
Quote sj77: Regardless of whether or not he has the right to be mad is not the issue. If you love someone, then you're going to be upset if they are with someone else. So yes, he has no right, but I don't blame him..IF he is upset. But he could also easily be upset at Phyllis because she didn't come clean with him when they first got back together. They were separated at the time, but still married. And a lie by ommission is still a lie. Not that I blame her for not sharing, but she still should have. You know what I'm saying. There you go stealing the words out of my mouth once again |
sj77![]() |
Quote overit: Quote sj77: Regardless of whether or not he has the right to be mad is not the issue. If you love someone, then you're going to be upset if they are with someone else. So yes, he has no right, but I don't blame him..IF he is upset. But he could also easily be upset at Phyllis because she didn't come clean with him when they first got back together. They were separated at the time, but still married. And a lie by ommission is still a lie. Not that I blame her for not sharing, but she still should have. You know what I'm saying. There you go stealing the words out of my mouth once again Overit, we're so insync!! |
overit![]() |
Quote sj77: Quote overit: Quote sj77: Regardless of whether or not he has the right to be mad is not the issue. If you love someone, then you're going to be upset if they are with someone else. So yes, he has no right, but I don't blame him..IF he is upset. But he could also easily be upset at Phyllis because she didn't come clean with him when they first got back together. They were separated at the time, but still married. And a lie by ommission is still a lie. Not that I blame her for not sharing, but she still should have. You know what I'm saying. There you go stealing the words out of my mouth once again Overit, we're so insync!! Hahaha it's so true and even if/when we're not we still manage to play nice, I love reading your posts! |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.