Soaps.com - MESSAGE BOARDS

There is no hope for this stupid broad or her satanic father!

Liz Cheney criticized Pres. Obama for his Dover AFB visit.


Oh I see...you and your father are...jealous, that after Bush/Cheney shut down the media coverage of the war dead, that Cheney, now out of the White House, is having second thoughts, and let's see....he got his dipstick tool of a daughter to criticize Obama for respecting our fallen troops?

Yea...that's the ticket!

BULLSH@T! The Cheneys are soul-less blood thirsty cowards that will criticize Obama at every turn.

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell just ripped Liz a new one:


videocafe.crooksandliars.com/node/32399

"Hey Liz, have you ever lost a relative in battle? I have. My cousin Johnny, West Point graduate like his father before him. I wish the President or the Vice President had met his casket on the way home.

You know what 'never' means, Liz? It means zero. It means that in over seven years of two wars, your dad never left the comfort of his White House office or the Vice President's mansion and got himself up to Dover to bear witness to how his warmongering fell on families of dead American soldiers. Never, not once."

30 Reasons why Fox is not legit:


mediamatters.org/columns/200910270002

[quote]Quote Eppy: You know what? We're all preaching to the choir here. The people who should be taking a second look at what FOX Noise is all about don't post in this thread, and they have said repeatedly that they won't come here because we never know what we're talking about or that we're too brutal. Open minds, yes?[/quote

DUHHHHH - - me neva knows wat me is talkin 'bout! I watch Fox and that is EXACTLY why I don't know what I am talking about!!! Seems to rub in!

And, WE ARE BRUTAL, BRUTAL, BRUTAL!!! Bring them on!!!!

Rush the Disgusting Hog is at again...shocker, hunh?

Wallace hosts Limbaugh on Fox News Sunday for half-hour deluge of misinformation


Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace dedicated the first half of his November 1 program to an interview with radio host Rush Limbaugh, during which Wallace allowed and in some cases prompted Limbaugh to advance numerous misleading, baseless, or outrageous claims, as well as engage in inflammatory attacks on President Obama.


mediamatters.org/research/200911010011

WOO HOOO!

How 'bout them NY-23 apples?

Not only is the former Republican candidate in a special New York congressional election now supporting the Democrat in the race, she is actively campaigning for him.

According to the Watertown Daily Times and confirmed by Owens' spokesman, former Republican candidate Dede Scozzafava appeared an event with Democrat Bill Owens in Canton, New York Sunday.

"It's not about ideology, it's about the local issues," Scozzafava said during the event, according to the paper. She also urged her one-time opponent to avoid the "hateful and divisive" tactics that ultimately led to her withdrawal from the race 24 hours earlier.


politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/02/scozzafava-campaigns-for-owens/

Don't you want what he's smoking?

DiggsJohn Boehner Blames the NY-23 Republican In-Fighting on Those Not 'Actively Involved in the Political Process'


When asked by CNN's John King about the Republican Party in-fighting in the NY-23 race and if the party can survive in the Northeast region of the country if there is no room for moderates in their ranks, John Boehner tries to blame the “rebellion” going on now on “people who really have not been actively involved in the political process”. Oh really?

While that may be true of those out protesting, it’s certainly not true of the ones organizing them. Dick Armey and Tim Phillips are hardly people that could be called “not active in the political process”. Quite the opposite. And Sarah Palin who has interjected herself into that race was the Republican Vice-Presidential nominee the last election.

John Boehner has a bigger mess on his hands than he’s willing to admit which is evident by his response at the end of the segment when he says this:

KING: Let me ask you, lastly, though, but sometimes does the party need to draw a line?

What's the point of having a party if people in your party will attack your own nominees? I mean, where do you draw that line?

BOEHNER: Listen, I'm a big believer in Ronald Reagan's 11 commandment -- 11th commandment. Never talk ill about another Republican.

KING: That was not followed in this race.

BOEHNER: I know.





videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/john-boehner-blames-ny-23-republican-fight

just went to the site, if i am wrong please correct me, seems like the right wing nuts are going after the moderate republicians, they want their candidates running, they were influential enough to get a moderate to step down????? this is very good news for us

ps joe lieberman is an a hole, obama should have kicked his sorry azz to the curb

Last month, Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) proposed an amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations bill that would withhold defense contracts if companies “restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court.” Although the amendment passed, 30 Republican senators voted against it.


One of the Republicans singled out for especially harsh criticism following the vote was Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), who has a track record of siding against women’s rights. The Huffington Post’s Sam Stein reports that at a town hall meeting this past weekend, a constituent confronted Vitter about his vote. The woman, a rape victim, demanded that he explain why he opposed Franken’s amendment. Vitter refused to give her a straight answer.


As Sam Stein noted at the HuffPo--"The exchange was contentious, heart wrenching, and potentially damaging."


WOMAN: It meant everything to me that I was able to put the person who attacked me [behind bars]. And what allowed me to do that was our judicial process. I showed up in court every day to make sure that happen.

VITTER: And I'm absolutely supportive of any case like that being prosecuted criminally to the full extent of the law.

WOMAN: But there are rape victims who are being kept silent.

WOMAN: But how can you support [a law] that tells a rape victim that she does not have the right to defend herself?

VITTER: Ma'am The language in question did not say that in any way shape or form.

WOMAN: But it is unconstitutional to have a law that says a woman does not have a right to defend herself.

VITTER: You realize Mr. Obama was against that amendment that his administration was against that amendment

WOMAN: But I'm not asking Obama. I'm asking you.

VITTER: Do you think he's in favor in rape?

WOMAN: I'm asking you Senator. What if it was your daughter who was raped? Would you tell her to be quiet and take it? Would you tell your daughter to be silent?


videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/david-vitter-confronted-rape-victim-town-h

The myth of Fox News' ratings spike

Fact: The breathless claim that Fox News' ratings recently spiked thanks to the White House's public critique is bogus hype -- hype that Fox News and the Beltway press have relentlessly pushed.

It's just not true.

No matter how many times reporters and pundits made the claim, a detailed analysis of Nielsen ratings numbers clearly indicates that in the two weeks after the White House in mid-October sparked a media controversy by claiming Rupert Murdoch's channel was not a legitimate news organization, Fox News' ratings did not soar or go "through the roof." In fact, not only did Fox News' overall ratings not soar, they experienced no significant increase at all. Instead, in the two weeks following the initial verbal jousts with the White House, Fox News' total day ratings virtually flatlined.


mediamatters.org/columns/200911030004